• Home
  • Backcountry Reports
  • Avalanche Training Centres
  • Guides & Courses
  • Blog
  • Merchandise
  • Supporters
  • Members
  • About MSC
  • Contact
Mountain Safety Collective Australia
  • Home
  • Backcountry Reports
  • Avalanche Training Centres
  • Guides & Courses
  • Blog
  • Merchandise
  • Supporters
  • Members
  • About MSC
  • Contact
StabilitySummaryArtboard 38-A.png
 

STAB ASSESSMENT:
WET SLAB HAZARD REPORT


A quick few notes on the reporting standard we are using for this stability hazard.

Assumptions:
You know how to locate and access terrain safely, conduct this assessment, and understand the basic terms and assessment techniques (CT / ECT - Snowform Identification) consistent with your minimum AST2 (Or equivalent) training. 

Given the prevailing conditions we are looking for signs of WET SLAB instability. The two things that we are looking for are initiation ( a weak layer) and propagation (enough cohesion to create a fracture). Clues are harder to garner, look for remote triggered slides, and observed natural slides. If you get these kinds of warnings then we probably already have enough rough intel (Red Flags) about the hazard to raise a RED ALERT.

WET SLAB CODE RED PRELIMINARY ALERT
Thank you!

If conditions are safe enough to permit and / or 'Red flags' have been noted and responded to appropriately, in the process of running this patrol then conduct some pit tests in a suitable (<22˚ incline) aspect. Ideally at an altitude of 1700m or more, although this is not essential.  


STEP 1:

Snow Profile & Compression test (CT)
Starting with a simple column test, you will go through the process of isolating any weak layers. If you get quick, easy initiation results at any depth... don't nerd out, jump to Step 2. If not make routine records in your book (CT Scores and Depths), recording the shear quality ( fast/ resistant / stubborn), noting the interface of the weak layer(s) (Crystal forms). 


STEP 2:

Extended Column Test (ECT).
Here in Australia we have a variable and temperate climate, the rate of metamorphosis is relatively high. Our snowpack readily stabilises, establishing its ability to propagate is very important. In the case of wet slab, if the you don't get propagation on the extended column, but consistent easy CT score, the problem is a Wet Slide (Loose Wet) hazard. 

The pit we need for this is very specific for consistent reporting. The task is to isolate a column that is 90cm wide by 30cm from the front to back, and isolated to the depth of the weakness (if on crust), or ideally deeper (on rounds / facets etc). 

CLICK TO ENLARGE

TECHNIQUE

Having isolated the block as shown in FIG 1, using the same tapping / loading steps as your Compression Test, tap the loading area and observe closely any propagation across the column. If the column propagation extends the width of the column we report this as ECT:P, or if not report ECT:X.
You can record the loading step as (10), for example ECT:P(10)

Easy INITIATION? NO PROPOGATION: GO TO WET SLIDE OBSERVATION

Check out a demonstration video here just to be sure we are on the same page

STEP 3: Propagation Saw Test (PST)
If you got an ECT:P, or ECT:X but easy fast CT results then it will be worth running this quick additional study.  Using the side of the pit you have dug, isolate a column that is 30cm wide by 100cm

TECHNIQUE

Having isolated the block as shown in FIG 2
push the saw along the weakness in an uphill direction. Again we are waiting to see if the weakness propagates. We want to record three things here. The distance of the cut (X) along the total column (Y) when propagation occurred, and what pulled out (Z) (FIG 3) and the depth of the weak layer (A). This is recorded as PST:X/Y(Z)@Acm

Example:
PST:35/100(END)@35cm

CLICK TO ENLARGE

CLICK TO ENLARGE


Check out this demonstration of a propagation saw test

Had enough yet? Why not drop a Pooling Test Step 4:

Wet Slab / Slide Pooling Test .
Ok, this is far from an exact science, but we consider it an important part of establishing or eliminating this hazard. Over a 100m area you can get huge variation, so all we need to know is wether the moisture you have detected is pooling. 

TECHNIQUE

Find a slope, any slope steep enough really, as we are looking at a coverall instability. Avoid standing within of upslope of your test area. You will need a liquid dye, in quite large quantities (2 litres?), we use  organic beetroot juice as the most environmentally friendly solution. Pour grid at 30cm intervals (a sauce bottle is a good dispenser). The flow of liquid needs to be generous enough to penetrate to the depth of your crust. An art leant through trial and error. Go big so it looks like a geometric 'murder scene'.  Then let it settle for 1 hour. 

Artboard 42-A.jpg

Once the time is up, excavate the block. Then, cut along the upslope lines to expose the transported dye within the snowpack. You will find either continuous vertical lines (percolating), or a culmination along your crust which means pooling, the hazardous outcome. Either way, take some photos and flip them to us via email: advisory@mountainsportscollective.org. 

Artboard 43-A.jpg
Artboard 44-A.jpg

SUBMIT YOUR RESULTS
 

Date *
example: Memorial Cross Saddle / Mount Feathertop / -36.900237, 147.128886
How far, on average... let not be too technical, could you see
The Basics
Let's get started with some observations.
Known / Observed 'Class One' (Red Flag) instability signs.
Did you note any 'Class One' (Red Flag) instability signs before you hit the hill?
Natural 'Class Two' instability signs.
Did, in the course of your patrol see any natural indicators of snowpack instability?
Avalanche Activity should reference date, type, size, trigger, sensitivity, aspect, elevation, distribution, failure plane, depth
Recent Deposition *
In what quadrant has the most recent snow deposition occurred?
Weather Observations
Snowpack Stability Tests
Let us know the location / elevation / aspect / time and angle of inclination for the stability test(s) you performed.
List any CT scores from your single column test compression tests. The order for this is Score (CT#), Shear Quality (Q#), Bed surface crystal type (See appendix) & Size @ Depth from surface. Its just got to make sense, don't worry too much.
Visible Moisture within snow pack
STEP 2 / How did the ECT test go?
Pooling Test
If you conducted a pooling test, what results did you observe?
What was the score?
How many loading steps did it require to initiate propagation?
Thank you!